OpenAI has finally released its ChatGPT app for Windows – here’s how it compares to Copilot

With the recent launch ChatGPT application for Windows, users now have direct access to the popular artificial intelligence model on their desktop computers. At the same time, many users discovered Microsoft Co-pilot when using applications such as Word, Excel and Teams, since they are already deeply integrated into the Microsoft ecosystem. Both tools are based on large language models (LLMs) and provide significant performance improvements, but how do they compare? Let’s take a look at their similarities and differences, and which one is best for different users.

Similarities

OpenAI logo on a phone, placed on top of a laptop keyboard

(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Both ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot help generate content, automate, and analyze data based on user queries as they both use natural language processing (NLP) based OpenAIGPT architecture. Since the content output will be similar, although not the same, you may find that you simply prefer one type over the other. I found ChatGPT’s responses to be more friendly and conversational, which naturally appealed to me. However, some users may find that a no-nonsense approach suits their style.

ChatGPT’s free tier provides basic access to its features, so for users who want premium options, including faster replies, latest model GPT-4 would be the best option. Likewise, the free version of Microsoft Copilot does the bare minimum, but more robust features can be found in the Microsoft 365 subscription tier.

Differences

Microsoft Office running on laptop — (Image credit: Taspol Sangsi/Shutterstock)

Models differ most in the degree of integration with existing software. Microsoft Copilot integrates seamlessly into the Microsoft ecosystem and can transfer data from one application to another. Additionally, Copilot can access personalized data through Microsoft Graph, allowing it to do everything from drafting emails and summarizing documents to generating reports. Deep connectivity makes this AI model ideal for professionals who are already heavy users of Microsoft tools such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Teams.

However, ChatGPT works alone. It is a standalone application that can be integrated with third party applications via API. So, although it is not yet integrated into the ecosystem, it is for this reason that it is much more flexible and has a wider range of task capabilities. Its versatility allows it to handle everything from coding to creative content creation without the constraints of a structured ecosystem. The versatility of ChatGPT may appeal to casual users who do not use business applications regularly, as integrating ChatGPT into enterprise systems requires more effort.

Customization

A man was sitting at a table and working at a computer

(Image credit: Future)

Another key difference is the processing and use of data. Copilot excels at providing personalized, context-sensitive responses because it is so tightly integrated with Microsoft applications. It can use emails, documents, or meeting notes and invitations to provide customized ideas and suggestions. For this reason, Copilot is excellent for streamlining workflows and maintaining high efficiency in a business environment.

ChatGPT, on the other hand, generates responses based on its extensive training data, but does not have real-time access to personal or enterprise-specific information. Because the AI model is not integrated into the back-end system, it is less able to offer contextual information. Where it shines in creativity and general tasks, it falls short where personalized data is critical.

Microsoft offers Copilot Studio, a platform where businesses can build their own AI solutions within Microsoft, customizing the AI for their specific workflows. ChatGPT also provides customization capabilities through its APIs and newly introduced no-code builder, but these often require more technical knowledge than the average user to implement compared to Copilot’s plug-and-play model.

Conclusion

The choice between ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot largely depends on your specific use case. Microsoft Copilot’s strengths lie in improving productivity, especially for those who use Microsoft 365 in their daily work.

ChatGPT, on the other hand, offers broader applications for a wider range of tasks. Its flexibility makes it useful for developers needing help with coding, writers looking for creative support, or regular users who need help with their queries. Its multimodal capabilities, including DALL-E for image generation and a code interpreter for data analysis, enhance versatility.

Both ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot are powerful AI assistants, but they serve different needs. If you’re deeply integrated into the Microsoft ecosystem and want a productivity tool that fits seamlessly into your workflow, Microsoft Copilot is the perfect solution. However, if you’re looking for a more versatile AI assistant that can handle a variety of tasks, from creative to technical, then you’ll probably look to ChatGPT as your AI model. Ultimately the decision depends on whether you prioritize integration and performance or flexibility and customization.